I refer to
the discovery Mr Brown made many years ago underneath a microscope. He was observing something underneath the
microscope when he discovered the phenomena we know today as atoms. My take on this is very much – based on my
experience observing the parallel phenomena – for a noise in the vicinity where
Mr Brown did his observations under the microscope, to have had a parallel
influence on the phenomena he was observing underneath the microscope and which
he could at that stage only refer to as atoms.
My question
though, I do realize this parallel phenomena of sound and movements and light,
I am just in question about where did science discover the parallel phenomena’s
existence. I still need to get this
picture in the clarity with my own observations and experiences. I know about this scientific phenomena, the
parallel existence where something that happens at one place in the universe,
simultaneously has an event happening at another place in the universe, though,
my first hand experience of it in my observation of it is much better. That is why it is my take on this phenomena
to be the atom phenomena a man like Mr Brown and his microscope encountered. I can also add the parallel phenomena to be
related to sound and light and movement.
In creation
everything someway, somehow has a tendency toward order. Encountering the parallel phenomena and
having worked with this phenomena for some years now, at first having no idea
what it was I was dealing with, left me in a place to get to “know” it
better. Things like, I can have some
indication as to what their orientations are.
At first, when I had no idea what I was dealing with, it was difficult
to deal with, but being a lover of geometry and order in mathematics, once I discovered
the phenomena for what it was, the same beauty I found in a geometry problem
and in the order that can be found in geometry and mathematics, unfolded in
this phenomena as well. This phenomena
has got the same qualities. I have made
observations as to certain aspects they are capable of. As I said, it may sound impossible as Mr
Brown and further has known the atoms as “unseen” phenomena. My take on this is: Should Mr Brown now be informed as to the
possibility that maybe it was a sound in his vicinity when he made his
observations underneath the microscope, will he eventually still hold this
position of the atoms as a phenomena of “unseen” character. This “unseenness” of this phenomena, is
becoming more clear once one’s take on it makes it more rational as it is from
somewhere. For instance, a sound or
noise that was in the same room or outside somewhere. It may have been a bird twittering or a dog
barking that made Mr Brown discover the atoms that was in unseen capacity
influencing his observations.
This
phenomena is still new to me, yet I have worked with it for many years in my
own life, not realizing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment